Archive for the ‘application virtualization’ Category

Hyper-V3 may give VMWare a run for its money this year

 

VMware has the quality, market share, and price-point of a high-end IT industry leader.  It also sits in between the hardware layer and the OS layer, a position that our friends in Redmond do not like to share with anyone if they can help it.   Looks like 2012 may be the year that Microsoft gets serious about competition in this space with HyperV3.  Some good technical stuff from Julio Urquidi  here.  Also see this good piece from Beth Pariseau for some insight into the details below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virtualization 2012: Hyper-V 3 vs. vSphere 5 showdown looms

Beth Pariseau, Senior News Writer, SearchServerVirtualization.com

Microsoft’s Hyper-V has been making steady progress catching up to VMware for years, but as IT pros look ahead into 2012, they see the battle between these two virtualization vendors heating up like never before.

In one corner: VMware vSphere 5, made generally available in August, and capable of supporting up to 1 TB of RAM and 32 virtual CPUs per virtual machine (VM). Other new features include Auto Deploy, which can automatically provision hosts according to user-defined rules; overhauled High Availability (rechristened Fault Domain Manager); policy-driven storage provisioning; and Storage Distributed Resource Scheduler.

In the other corner: Microsoft Hyper-V 3.0, still at the developer preview stage. If released as planned before the end of 2012, however, it will contain several key features to bring it into closer competition with vSphere. Those features include a new extensible virtual switch (which has received Cisco’s pledge of support), true live storage migration, shared-nothing live migration, and new scalability with up to 32 virtual CPUs and 512 GB of memory — up from a limit of 4 vCPUs and 64 GB of RAM.

Read the full story here.


IBM making moves towards private cloud with Tivoli Updates

Carl Brooks of searchCloudComputing.com just put out an interesting piece on IBM’s updating as Tivoli as a complement and perhaps a replacement for VMware in the building of private clouds. The industry seems to be taking some notice of IBM’s approach to the cloud, finally.

IBM

 

Did IBM just change the game in private cloud?

By Carl Brooks, Senior Technology Writer

02 Mar 2011 | searchCloudComputing.com

Does IBM have the wherewithal to compete in the commodity hardware cloud?

Say “IBM” and “cloud computing” in the same breath and many IT managers will roll their eyes. The IT leader’s cloud strategy has been seen by many as a mess.

But that may be about to change. IBM recently revealed a beta program of updates to its Tivoli software that may breathe new life into the company’s private cloud ambitions.

The new capabilities include support for VMware’s VIM APIs in a variety of Tivoli tools, including image repositories, automated provisioning, application deployment and Tivoli Storage Manager (integrating TSM and VMware heretofore has not been pretty). Enhancements to Tivoli Provisioning Manager may include booting VMware images directly from block storage instead of having them preloaded into memory. IBM claims that images can be booted in seconds.

Read the rest here.

Carl Brooks is the Senior Technology Writer for SearchCloudComputing.com. Contact him at cbrooks@techtarget.com.

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Office 365 – Lookin’ Darn Good So Far…

Office 365

Once they add CRM to this in late 2011, it would be a hard matter most any mid-sized Microsoft shop to resist Office 365.   Who wants to own a bunch of servers and run them for office stuff, if they don’t have to? Office 365 gets you out of hosting a whole bunch of messy complex products and keeping up with patches and hardware, like CRM/SharePoint/OfficeLive/Exchange/Online VideoConfonference-GoToMeerting (Lynx).  But you still get to use the really good clients tools, like Word and Excel.  Powerful stuff, if they do no screw up the implementation of it (like too many cute IE dependencies).  I think this might be a good beta to join in 2011.  Google apps, watch out.

http://office365.microsoft.com/en-US/online-services.aspx

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Intel and the G-Dudes Publish the Hype Around Cloud 2010

Cloud Computing H-cycle july 2010 (c) Gartner Inc.

Intel recently worked out deal with Gartner Inc. which allows them to post one one of their most the up to date and detailed version of the famous Gartner  Hype Cycle as relates to Cloud Computing.  You can find the file here:

http://premierit.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/5910-1-4916/Hype%20Cycle%20for%20Cloud%20Computing%2C%202010.pdf

The analysis reminds me a bit of Carl Pagans famous old saw “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”  In the cloud hype world, I think this means that the hype is deep and long, but the potential is extraordinary.  Not how much already has been on, and they claim were are just at the peak.  As an aside, the analysts do a nice job with definitions of terms.

This little fellow is (c) Gartner Inc., so you will need to download it right from Intel’s site to have a closer look.

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Virtualization Speed Traps: Five Ways to Drag Apps Down

As you virtualize more of your company’s applications, avoid these five mistakes that could kill application performance for users. One piece of bad news: Your IT staff will have to learn to play nicely.

As you virtualize more of your company’s applications, avoid these five mistakes that could kill application performance for users. One piece of bad news: Your IT staff will have to learn to play nicely.

By Kevin Fogarty, CIO.com

Computacenter – CIO — What has driven the market for virtual servers more than the potential to squeeze several servers worth of performance out of just one physical server? It’s the relative ease with which most applications can move from a physical infrastructure to a virtual one.

But make the move without planning, run into a few of the major performance “gotchas”, and your apps sitting on a brand-new virtual infrastructure will run like they’re locked in an old box that’s sitting around because it’s too much trouble to throw out. Here are five virtualization performance points to keep in mind.

1. Skimpy Hardware

Sure, one main purpose of virtualization is to make physical servers disappear, but that doesn’t mean the hardware itself doesn’t matter, says Ian Scanlon, IS operations manager for Computacenter (CCC), a datacenter and IT services company based in London but covering most of Europe.

Computacenter migrated the 700-plus servers running its internal IT operations to VMware beginning in 2007, and has had very few performance problems, even with applications very demanding of either I/O or computing resources, Scanlon says. All the VMs run on relatively high-end HP blade servers, with 48 GB of RAM and plenty of SAN space each. Without that elbow room, the data warehouse, SQL Server-based applications and other demanding systems might not pass muster with the business units, he says.

2. Weak Supporting Characters

Virtual servers definitely save money, but if you focus too much on cost savings when you’re setting them up, you’re not going to save money or get decent performance, Scanlon says. High-bandwidth network connections, fiber rather than copper, for example, and powerful SAN gear make far more sense than saving a few bucks in capital costs upfront, he says.

“We went into this [migration] with the goal of saving costs, initially, which we haven’t really done,” he says. “The benefits really are in agility, the amount of time it takes to stand up a new server or expand something, and making management easier and issues like that. We’re not really saving much, but I don’t think anyone here would say it was the wrong decision.”

According to CIO research, plenty of companies do see substantial savings from virtualization efforts, but they value agility gains just as much.

3. Downsized Support Plans

Everyone likes getting “free” servers by running several VMs on one physical box, but that doesn’t mean you’ve actually gotten rid of any of the load on your infrastructure, says Chris Wolf, analyst at the Burton Group. In fact, you’ve probably increased the load on your power, network and storage resources.

Five VMs on a physical host use the same amount of bandwidth and disk space as five physical servers, and require the same amount of configuration, security, management, licensing, patching and all the other work that goes into keeping one application or a whole data center running, Wolf says. Cutting your support plans or failing to plan increases to accommodate new VMs may not make a difference on day one of a migration, but software rot will quickly drag down performance.

4. Finger-Pointing Instead of Troubleshooting

In many companies with IT silos, people who don’t handle shared responsibility well will pass responsibility for anything running on a virtualized server to the “virtualization guy,” says Bob Quillan, senior director of marketing at EMC’s (EMC) Ionix division, which focuses on management of virtual infrastructures.

By creating another silo responsible for something that touches every other department in IT, companies set themselves up for extended rounds of finger-pointing—rather than troubleshooting when something goes wrong. Traditional IT groups aren’t used to the speed with which a virtual infrastructure changes (a condition EMC techs refer to as “V-Motion Sickness”) so they tend to blame problems first on that. Breaking down silos and working out triage and response procedures that work within a virtual environment as well as a physical one, is the only way to keep a small breakdown from becoming a big one, Quillan says.

5. Overcrowding Your Applications

The hypervisor, OS and hardware may all be the same between two VMs running on the same machine (or identical machines): but the applications running on them change the dynamics so completely that you have to continue planning capacity according to the demands of each application on each server, Scanlon says.

It’s easy to put half a dozen VMs running a normal application on one physical server, but only two VMs running an I/O-heavy SQL Server app or power-consuming data warehouse, he says.

Running Citrix virtual-application servers on a VM isn’t a problem either, unless you forget that the Citrix app itself is a virtual server whose resource demands will skyrocket when everyone who uses it logs in, if you haven’t tested it under real-world conditions, he says.

“We’ve had relatively few problems in performance since we migrated, but I think that’s mostly because we started with really good [hardware],” Scanlon says. “It kept us out of a lot of trouble.”

Get more story here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Virtualization and software pricing: Very tricky

by Elisabeth Horwitt, ComputerWorld

August 16, 2010

Virtualization can provide significant TCO savings for server and desktop hardware, and in desktop software and security administration. But saving on software license costs through virtualization is problematic. For one thing, vendors can’t seem to agree on a model that works for both them and their customers, says Amy Konary, a research director at IDC.

Many enterprise software vendors still charge per hardware box, which means customers can save by consolidating applications on a single server that has multiple CPUs. However, a growing number of vendors, such as Oracle, charge per CPU, says Altimeter Group partner Ray Wang.

Further, vendors often insist that you buy licenses for every hardware box that can run a virtualized application, even if the software is being held in reserve for backup purposes, says Gartner Vice President Bill Snyder. Companies with thousands of servers should determine a limited number on which a virtualized enterprise application, such as a database, can run, he advises.

RotaDyne, a printing press roller manufacturer, had to pay VMware for unused processors that are being held in reserve for backup purposes, says Kirk Patten, RotaDyne’s IT director. On the plus side, the company could dispense with existing site-backup server licenses for each branch, he adds. Overall, migrating branches to VMware has saved the firm tens of thousands of dollar annually, Patten says.

Managing virtualized software assets also poses some unique challenges, IT administrators have found. “It’s easy for administrators to bring up boxes on a whim, so you can lose track of licenses,” says Patten. To help prevent this problem, software asset management vendors are working to provide tools that can track virtual machine instances across multiple physical machines, according to Howard Hastings, CA’s IT asset management evangelist.

Virtualization software pricing is at least as iffy as it is on the desktop side, experts agree. Vendors like VMware and Citrix offer options like concurrent licenses, which charge according to the number of users online at peak times, says Simon Bramfitt, an analyst at Burton Group. However, such licenses can cost about twice as much as individual ones, he adds. Vendors such as NoMachine bundle the cost of virtual desktop clients into the server license.

Another key issue is roaming rights: How many licenses does an end user need in order to migrate his virtual client from his corporate desktop to whatever computing devices he uses at home or on the road?

One recent positive development was that Microsoft restructured its Virtual Enterprise Centralized Desktop license to provide end users with unlimited roaming rights, at a slightly cheaper price than it previously charged. Previously, individuals could use only one primary and one secondary device per license.

The bottom line: “You want to investigate vendors’ licensing agreements,” says Patten. “Sometimes you’ll find opportunities to save money.”

Read more here.

Horwitt is a freelance reporter and former Computerworld senior editor based in Waban, Mass. Contact her at ehorwitt@verizon.net.

Tags: , , ,


Who’s actually spending on cloud computing?

By Carl Brooks, Technology Writer

SearchCloudComputing.com

While cloud computing continues to gather steam, thanks to the established, money-making efforts of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Rackspace, much attention has turned to the lucrative enterprise IT market as the next battleground for software vendors. Companies are focusing on building and maintaining private clouds: internal IT environments that operate and deliver services like Amazon’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2). But is that where the money is?

Credible signs point elsewhere, as the hosting and service provider market appears to be the real opportunity in cloud computing at the moment. Now that the definitions of what is and isn’t cloud computing have been largely settled, hosting firms and some cloud software vendors are forgoing the elusive enterprise data center customer and quietly using cloud to make money instead.

“We have literally hundreds of customers every month signing up for cloud,” said Peter Sexton, COO of GigeNET, an established managed hosting provider based in Chicago. Sexton said GigeNET had no shortage of customers for its regular hosting and colocation offerings, but many of those same customers were clamoring for on-demand and pay-as-you-go hosting.

Sexton said that GigeNET had developed the platform to run its cloud computing offering completely in-house. Based on Xen and built out on a cluster of new servers and gear that GigeNET designed itself, he said it was an unqualified success for the investment.

Cloud providers aim at service providers

Some cloud providers, like OpSource, are explicitly switching focus from selling clouds to individual businesses and targeting service providers for partnerships instead. OpSource has enjoyed some success with its cloud services, but CEO Treb Ryan said the end-user cloud customer market was basically saturated, and its original managed hosting customers (primarily Software as a Service (SaaS) vendors) were the ones they saw coming onboard.

“We found more than 30% of our existing customers asking for OpSource Cloud,” he said.

Ryan said the demand for cloud among hosters and service providers was crystal clear. Every cent they made was based on adding value (in the form of services or capabilities) on top of delivering computing power, and the higher the margin between operational costs and revenue, the more money they made. Ryan said the one thing cloud computing excelled at was driving operational efficiency and lowering costs.

So much so, in fact, that Ryan said OpSource can afford to offer partners steep discounts on its “retail” cloud rates and still make money itself, because its own margins on operating costs are so high. Ryan wouldn’t give specific details, but said even charging $0.04 per hour left “very comfortable margins.”

Cloud offerings of all shapes and sizes

OpSource highlights the intersection between hosting, cloud and SaaS, but what’s more telling is the prevalence of cloud offerings. Every major hosting provider has a cloud product line, with a variety of offerings that sometimes stretch far from the canonical example set by AWS but are still recognizable as cloud computing. An overwhelming majority of small and medium hosters have plans to or are starting to offer cloud services, simply because there is money to be made immediately.

“$20 million to $100 million [revenue] range,” said Reuven Cohen, CEO of cloud platform software company Enomaly. “That’s the market, and these guys win because they’re on the ground in their area.”

Cohen said he has been targeting hosting providers for some time now, because they have a natural appetite for cloud computing and because the private cloud market is ill-defined and largely obscure when it comes to streamlining enterprise IT.

“You hear about this supposedly private cloud market, but in reality, most virtualization vendors have rebranded their products as cloud,” he said, dismissing the notion of radical transformations within enterprise data centers.

He said that’s coming, but it’s years away; at the moment, things inside enterprise IT organizations are completely focused around either buying SaaS products and outsourcing or application virtualization.

Cohen’s firm operates without venture capital backing, so he has a vested interest in making sales to whomever is buying, and he noted that Enomaly is in the black.

He also said there was a lack of maturity in enterprise-class cloud infrastructure products at the moment, whereas setting up and selling compute infrastructure or storage clouds was a natural evolution of managed hosting and virtualization. Providers were already out in front on both virtualization and selling IT services, so they are the obvious choice for cloud computing systems as well, according to Cohen.

Enomaly has an extensive list of service provider customers to prove his point. Virtualization vendor Parallels recently announced, like OpSource, that it was going to focus on selling to service providers. It claims it helps more than 5,000 service providers deliver services.

<Snip>

Read more at http://searchcloudcomputing.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid201_gci1517296,00.html

Carl Brooks is the Technology Writer for SearchCloudComputing.com. Contact him at cbrooks@techtarget.com

Tags: , , , ,


Obama’s $79 Billion Tech Plan May Favor The Cloud

By Katie Hoffmann, Bloomberg

Vivek Kundra

Vivek Kundra, the Obama official with $79 billion to spend on technology, said the government can be more efficient by putting programs on the Web, paving the way for companies like Microsoft Corp. and Google Inc. to win business.

The government wants to put data such as health-care pricing information on Internet-based systems as they grow more secure, the U.S. chief information officer said in an interview this week. The U.S. can cut costs by outsourcing that work, said Kundra, who has overseen the federal technology budget since President Barack Obama appointed him last year.

Microsoft, Google and Amazon.com Inc. are all offering more databases and programs online, allowing customers to curb storage costs. Sharing software and data that way would shrink U.S. storage needs, helping to cut expenses after previous governments spent more than $500 billion on data centers and other technology initiatives in the past decade, Kundra said.

“It’s mind-boggling,” said Kundra, a New Delhi native who previously managed information technology for the District of Columbia. “It costs a fortune, it’s duplicative and it’s an energy hog.”

The model Kundra is looking at is known as cloud computing, where users go through the Web to access computers, applications and data instead of through their own servers. He declined to say which companies are best fit to operate government clouds. He noted that Google and Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft have introduced government-focused clouds in the past few months.

‘Darwinian Pressure’

“Let the free markets decide which company is best,” he said. “We want lots of companies with lots of great ideas competing with a Darwinian pressure.”

Global spending on cloud computing may top $44 billion in 2013, according to research firm IDC in Framingham, Massachusetts.

‘“We are excited to see the U.S. federal government embrace the cloud and expect it will further boost confidence among businesses of all sizes to do the same,” Ron Markezich, vice president of Microsoft Online, said in an e-mailed statement.

Cloud computing can give the government “dramatically reduced costs,” said David Mihalchik, who heads federal business development for Mountain View, California-based Google. “All of these things help government employees to collaborate together, be more productive, and the government saves money,” Mihalchik said.

Government Work

Kundra, 35, traveled last week to the West Coast, where he met with companies such as Google and Apple Inc. in California, as well as Microsoft and Amazon.com in Washington, on a 48-hour tour of technology businesses. He said he was impressed by how they created online platforms that allowed third-party software developers to collaborate.

Last year, Kundra created Data.gov, which lets federal agencies post information for the public online and now supports more than 169,000 databases. Other projects, such as those that deal with public safety or health care, also could be put on a cloud, creating a way to share ideas and data at lower costs, he said.

Companies including Microsoft, Google and Seattle-based Amazon.com are seeking federal security certification so they can compete for work within the federal government, he said.

When he managed D.C.’s technology, Kundra moved more than 35,000 municipal employees to Google Enterprise Apps, which provides e-mail, spreadsheet and word-processing programs via the Internet. He said he’s willing to move federal employees to a similar program, if security is proven.

“As long as these companies address security, we’re going to be shifting our resources toward cloud computing,” Kundra said. The government would still own and operate some of its own secure cloud-computing systems.

Read more here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Virtualization Shines in Cautious IT Hiring Picture

Who will IT managers call first when they can hire new staffers again? Virtualization and cloud skills will serve you well, new research says.

Kevin Fogarty, CIO Magazine

January 19, 2010

Surveys showing the spending and hiring picture for IT as bleak for at least the first half of 2010 seem to reflect more the caution of IT managers and CIOs than their real hiring plans.

(For more background on the current IT hiring climate, see two related articles: IT Hiring Increases Last Month Despite Broader Jobs Decline and IT Departments Need Right Skills to Recover in 2010.)

“IT budgets are flat right now because of the uncertain environment, but I expect as people become more confident, the real spending will rise to between four percent and five percent,” according to Andrew Bartels, IT spending and budget analyst at Forrester Research and author of a report released this month that predicts little, if any uptick in IT hiring during 2010.

“Actually we expect purchasing to be up about seven percent for the year, but the staff part of that spending is probably going to lag,” he said. “Companies will buy equipment, but they don’t want to make a commitment to people if they’re worried they’ll have to lay them off in six months.”

The report predicts IT spending will rise 6.6 percent in the U.S. this year, compared to a drop of 8.2 percent last year.

A survey of 110 IT managers at large companies by Wall Street analysts Wedbush Securities showed projects involving virtualization, Windows 7 and enterprise software were all high on corporate priority lists, and that the number of projects stalled for budget reasons has dropped from 38 percent in late 2008 to 18 percent during the last quarter.

If hiring does lag purchasing, this is going to be a good year for recruiters, according to Ellis Blevins, a division director for recruiting giant Robert Half Technology.

“What we see is an explosion in IT resource needs,” according to Blevin, who says increased demand her Denver-based group is consistent with IT hiring in other areas of the country.

“With the economy the way it was, everyone was in wait-and-see mode,” she says. “We have companies coming out of the block in Q1 with 30 people for this project, 40 for that; there’s a lot of pent-up demand coming to fruition.”

Many more of those job openings are coming in as contract-to-hire or full-time employment than has been true the past year, when temporary or contract-only jobs were a common option for companies that needed IT staff but didn’t want to commit to increased headcount, she says.

This quarter, according to a survey Robert Half Technology took of 133 CIOs from companies planning to add staff, business growth is the biggest reason driving the decision to hire. That’s followed closely by rising workloads and an increased need for customer or end-user support.

Fifty-eight percent of companies planning to hire IT people plan to hire only full-timers, the report also showed.

The return of demand might seem sudden, but so was the drop-off, according to Tom Silver, senior vice president of tech-job ad site Dice North America.

“In 2008 we were running average [numbers of job ads on Dice.com] of around 85,000 until September ’08, when Lehman Bros. happened,” he says, citing the surprise bankruptcy announcement that shocked a shaky U.S. financial market.

“The job [ad] count dropped like a rock; by the end of the year we were down around 55,000,” he says. “As rough a year as ’09 was, the job count stayed relatively level. The lowest we got was 47,000; it started to tick back up in the fourth quarter. We’re over 50,000 and we’re projecting that to continue to improve.”

Virtualization, Cloud Pros in Demand

The tech in highest demand according to its mention in job ads is programming in Java or J2EE, or database administration, because those skills are part of almost every IT project.

Among the fastest-growing skills, however, are virtualization—which at about 2000 ads is 21 percent above this time last year—and cloud computing, which went from zero last year to 300 today.

“So most other things are flat or down and those two are growing,” Silver says. “You also see companies like USAToday, Delta, Newsweek or Netflix posting them, so it’s not just the higher-tech Silicon Valley companies that are looking for virtualization.”

That demand reflects a need to get stalled IT projects back on track, and infrastructure improvements completed, Blevin says.

“Network administration, virtualization, system administration, those are the heavy-hitting job requests right now—the ones companies need to get themselves up to speed as the economy comes back,” Blevin says. “They want to rapidly develop and deploy applications without issues about servers and infrastructure. Everyone wants to be able to get what they need and get it quickly.”

Bartels, however, like his survey respondents, is only cautiously optimistic.

“Virtualization obviously, is one of the big priorities [for 2010], but even more than most things, adding more virtualization doesn’t mean you’re going to add more virtualization staff,” Bartels says.

Virtual servers are so much easier to maintain than physical servers that it’s possible for very small staffs to manage large virtual infrastructures, reducing the number of bodies needed in the data center.

A November, 2009 report from Enterprise Management Associates, which was sponsored by VMware (VMW), says that in U.S. companies the average number of physical servers one administrator manages is 65. The average for virtual servers is 77. That’s not shockingly high, but it does represent an increase in staff efficiency (and a reason not to need to hire more staff) of about 10 percent.

“Once you hire someone who knows virtualization, when you acquire more licenses, you don’t necessarily have to acquire more staff,” Bartels says. “Even if spending on virtualization software and tools goes up far more than other things—even 10 or 15 percent, staffing might only rise by one percent.”

On the other hand, “if you can use virtualization to save some IT dollars, you can add a person to your staff that you’ve wanted to for a year and a half and haven’t been able to,” Blevin says.

Read more here.

Tags: , , , , ,


Citrix Dazzle: Putting the “personal” back into computing

Citrix Dazzle — the first self-service “storefront” for enterprise applications gives corporate employees 24×7 self-service access to the applications they need to work. Dazzle offers a rich, intuitive user experience that requires no training. If you’ve used DirecTV or Apple iTunes, you already know how to use Dazzle. Dazzle makes self-service IT a reality for the first time ever, giving users simple access to apps and IT services, and bringing the economics of the web to enterprise IT.

Read more here, or check out this video demo it:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,